Supreme Court to talk about Obama 3rd time. Berg eligibility case set for conference Jan. 9
Posted: December 19, 2008
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

One of the original legal challenges to President-elect Barack Obama’s
eligibility for office to reach the U.S. Supreme Court now has been scheduled for a conference, a meeting at which the justices discuss its merits and whether to step into the fray.

Online schedules posted by the court show the case brought by attorney Philip J. Berg is set for a conference Jan. 9.

The case is one among several that already have reached the U.S. Supreme Court and address the issue of Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the U.S. Constitution’s requirement that presidents be “natural born” citizens.

Berg has submitted several requests for injunctions, seeking the court’s order to stay proceedings in the electoral process until his case is heard, but the request have been rejected.

His original claim, however, remains on track to be heard

WND senior reporter Jerome Corsi had gone to both Kenya and Hawaii prior to the election to investigate issues surrounding Obama’s birth. But his research and discoveries only raised more questions.

The biggest question was why, if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn’t simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors.

The governor’s office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. There have been other allegations that Obama actually was born in Kenya during a time when his father was a British subject. A one point a Kenyan ambassador said Obama’s birthplace in Kenya already was being recognized.
Last month, WND reported the worries over a “constitutional crisis” that could loom over the issue of Obama’s citizenship.

“Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void,” argues the Alan Keyes case pending in California, “Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal.”

With such high stakes, WND earlier launched a letter campaign to contact Electoral College members and urge them to review the controversy.

That followed a campaign that sent more than 60,000 letters by overnight delivery to the U.S. Supreme Court when one case contesting Obama’s eligibility for the Oval Office was pending.

A separate petition, already signed by more than 185,000 also is ongoing asking authorities in the election to seek proof Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the “natural-born American” clause in the Constitution.


3 Responses to “OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL”

  1. Ted Says:


    Since the Supreme Court has now prevented itself from acknowledging the question of whether Barack H. Obama is or is not an Article II “natural born citizen” based on the Kenyan/British citizenship of Barack Obama’s father at the time of his birth (irrespective of whether Barack Obama is deemed a “citizen” born in Hawaii or otherwise) as a prerequisite to qualifying to serve as President of the United States under the Constitution — the Court having done so at least three times and counting, first before the Nov 4 general election and twice before the Dec 15 vote of the College of Electors — it would seem appropriate, if not necessary, for all Executive Branch departments and agencies to secure advance formal advice from the United States Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel as to how to respond to expected inquiries from federal employees who are pledged to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States” as to whether they are governed by laws, regulations, orders and directives issued under Mr. Obama during such periods that said employees, by the weight of existing legal authority and prior to a decision by the Supreme Court, believe in good faith that Mr. Obama is not an Article II “natural born citizen”.

    Moreover, each and every member of Congress should be notified that he or she is personally liable (can be sued) for his or her own failure, or the same in conspiracy with other members, to perform what is a ministerial and constitutional duty, that is, to require and/or insist that Presidential electoral votes only be counted for candidates who are “natural born citizens” under Article II of the United States Constitution, the failure of which creates a cause of action for deprivation of claimants’ constitutional rights (as allowed under the Bivens case) against employees of the Federal Government, in this case, to a lawful President and Commander in Chief, and therefore, for deprivation of adequate continuation of the United States as a Constitutional Republic. The constitutionally tortious conduct is not subject to congressional immunity and would be the jettison of Article II of the Constitution by failure to stop and/or object to the counting of electoral votes for Barack H. Obama who has admitted that at the time of his birth his father was a Kenyan/British citizen and not a citizen of the United States of America.

    Finally, if 1/20/09 comes and goes with a usurper in the Whitehouse (that is, Obama is definitely NOT an Article II “natural born citizen” — dad Kenyan/British citizen at BHO’s birth — albeit he MAY be a 14th Amendment “citizen”) with usurper enablers in Congress and the Supreme Court … God help us because many of the people will — rightfully and under our Constitution and Declaration of Independence — endeavor through other means to take back the Government from what is nothing less than a non-constitutional coup d’etat. (SCOTUS now does have the power to forestall that grim yet inevitable scenario, otherwise the blood and possible loss of our Constitutional Republic is SQUARELY ON THEIR HEADS.)

  2. Greg Says:

    In an earlier post that IDIOT Patriot made some comparison between the Reagan and the Clinton administrations scandals. I need to set that record straight. Patriot must get all his/her information from The NY Times or MSNBC because it could not be more wrong, one sided or lacking of any truth. The following are the true, researched facts.

    Reagan was never directly involved in any scandal associated with his administration. Reagan admin scandals were never for personal gain. They were to protect and preserve the freedom of the USA. The Democratic Congress did absolutely nothing to help save America before, during and after the debacle of the Carter years. Reagan alone saved us with the support of the Republicans and Reagan Dems in the Congress. Bin Laden was a freedom fighter funded by the US to keep USSR out of Afghanistan. Clinton refused 3 opportunities to get the Bin Laden who was a sworn enemy of the US.
    Unlike LBJ. JFK, Carter and Clinton, Reagan always admitted his mistakes and acknowledged the pain of sending the Marines to Beirut. Reagan was NO FRIEND to communism. Even Gorbechev has stated that Reagan was the sole reason that the USSR fell. I know the facts hurt but the facts are what you don’t get when you depend solely on the liberal media. Broaden your horizons and you will find the truth. Here are more facts for you.


    – The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
    – Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
    – Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
    – Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
    – Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
    – First president sued for sexual harassment.
    – Accused of rape
    – First first lady to come under criminal investigation
    – Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
    – First president to establish a legal defense fund.
    – First president to be held in contempt of court
    – Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
    – Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
    – First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
    47 individuals associated with the Clinton machine were convicted of crimes. An additional 61 individuals were indicted for crimes. 14 people were imprisoned.
    Whitewater, cattlegate, nannygate, helicoptergate, travelgate, Flowersgate, filegate, Fostergate, billing recordsgate, Jonesgate, lincoln bedroomgate, coffeegate, donorsgate, Templegate, Hubbelgate, lippogate, chinagate, Willeygate, misslie technology to chinagate, wag the doggate, Broaderickgate, pbsgate, emailgate, vandalgate, lootergate, pardongate, burgergate and what really happened to Ron Browngate.
    A pretty embarrassing criminal list if I do say so myself. Especially for a CLOWN who said in his inaugeration speech that his administration would be the most honest in history!!
    There are already similarities between Clinton and Obama. They both have the exact same distinction as the only two Presidents in history with numerous criminal associations before they enter the White House. So it seems you are on the right track Patriot. We are most likely in for an administration filled with lies, dishonesty and criminal activity. That may not matter to the idiots that voted for Obama but it does matter to the people that Love America!!

  3. Patriot Says:

    So I see this blog attracts many lying, nazi neo-cons. The only thing Clinton did was be hated by the neo-cons. So they had the Republican machine continously investigate every single rumor they could conjure up. Clinton was never indicted in any of the above referrenced investigations. I don’t think his associates would have gone to prison themselves to protect him or Hillary, So the only deduction that could be made is that he was innocent. In fact the entire Lewinsky fiasco was based on the lies and innuendo of the Paula Jones lawsuit. Whatever Clinton did with Lewinsky was between two consenting adults. It should have ended there. Unfortunately the Right wing machine was hell bent on ruining a great President. No mater what, the Clinton years remain unequaled in progress, finance, world respect, job growth, low inflation, low unemployment and paying down our national debt. These FACTS cannot be changed by an “IDIOT” that does his research on Right Wing websites!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: